Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

M8D1 Future Creativity

M8D1 Future Creativity

Q In the concluding chapter of Explaining Creativity, author Keith Sawyer describes “changes in global society that are changing the nature of creativity.” Creativity research also continues to change since the time he wrote these words for publication in 2012. Imagine the future of creativity as you explore some of the latest examples of creative problem solving in the creative domains we have studied. Discussion Questions Prepare for your discussion by reviewing the required readings and videos described in each discussion topic. This activity aligns with module outcome 1. Respond to one of the following questions. 1. Think of ways that people actively involved in the creative domains described in Chapters 16-20 of Explaining Creativity are working toward solving long standing problems. One example is the Aperture magazine issue entitled "Vision and Justice," edited by Sarah Lewis, describing the ways photographers are working to cultivate an important visual landscape for African Americans. Select one domain and then compare/contrast two examples of visual artists, composers, writers, actors, business people, or scientists who are using collaborative creative problem solving techniques to offer solutions to long standing problems. What future projects do they have in mind? 2. After watching the TED talk by Navi Radjou, explore and evaluate two examples of the global practice of frugal innovation that solve a long-standing problem. What aspects of frugal innovation are included in your term project and why are they valuable? How might you employ some of the techniques of frugal innovation for future creative problem solving? 3. Review the list of topics deserving future research on pages 430 to 431 in Explaining Creativity. Choose one area of research. In the years since the text was published in 2012, what developments do you discover in this area of research? Where do you see this research moving forward beyond the present day? How might this research have an impact across cultures? 4. In an age of mash-ups and self-publishing, should we do away with criteria and selection in the arts? What would happen if we no longer had art galleries, museums and professional orchestras or opera companies? If these institutions are maintained, how do you think they should function in the future? What differences in future function might you see between the United States and Europe or the United States and Africa?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

I think that there must not be doing away with criteria and selection in arts. This is because there will be generalization of the overall concept of art if there is doing away with criteria and selection in arts. There will be no scope for diversity in creativity because of limited scope for criteria and selection in arts. There would be no place for abstract art because the selection of abstract art would not be possible to be attempted by any individual. If there would be no art galleries, museums and professional orchestras or opera companies, the definition and meaning of art and artistic products would become meaningless.